The Case of Mordechai Vanunu
Preeminent Hero of the Nuclear Age
Counterpunch
January 31, 2003
by MARK GAFFNEY
Each day we move closer to a Mideast war that could involve the use of
horrible weapons, even nukes. In this darkest hour since the 1962 Cuban
missile crisis, the shining example of one man's courage has never been more
relevant to the cause of peace. That man is Mordechai Vanunu, former Israeli
nuclear technician, and may well be the longest serving prisoner of
conscience anywhere in the world. Daniel Ellsberg recently referred to him
as "the preeminent hero of the nuclear age."
In September 1986, Mordechai Vanunu was illegally abducted by agents of the
Mossad for revealing to the world press information that confirmed the
existence of Israel's often-denied plutonium separation plant. The plant is
buried eighty feet below ground in the Negev desert, and had long escaped
detection. Since the 1960s it has been used to recover plutonium from spent
fuel rods from the Dimona nuclear reactor, located nearby. The plant
continues to be an integral part of Israel's ongoing nuclear weapons
program. Israel is believed to possess at least 200 nukes.
Then Prime Minister Shimon Peres ordered Vanunu' s abduction to silence the
whistleblower, and to bring him to trial for allegedly jeopardizing the
securi ty of the state of Israel. But Vanunu's real "crime" was speaking the
truth. And for that he was made to suffer a fate worse than death: eleven
years and five months in solitary confinement. Isolation in a tiny cell is a
well known form of torture, and one that can cause deep emotional scars and
mental impairment. During this period Vanunu was subjected to constant
harassments and humiliations: an obvious attempt by the Mossad to "break"
his will, or drive him over the edge. Amnesty International described the
conditions of his ordeal as "cruel, inhuman, and degrading."
Yet, the prisoner held firm as a rock. Nor has Vanunu since wavered from the
position of principle he articulated in the very beginning: that the only
sane path is full disclosure and abolition of nuclear weapons. From his
prison cell Mordechai wrote: "It is a dangerous illusion to believe they
[nuclear weapons] can be defensive....Only peace between states can promise
security."
The world gained another glimpse of Vanunu's character in 1998, shortly
after his removal from solitary and his placement in the general prison
population. At that time he was queried by Israeli officials about whether
he would agree to remain silent on the nuclear issue, implying an offer of
conditional release. But Vanunu refused. He insisted on his right to speak
freely. And he made it plain that being muzzled on the nuclear issue was
non-negotiable: not an option for his release. Vanunu is currently starting
the seventeenth year of his eighteen year sentence. One of the causes for
which Vanunu risked his life, full disclosure of Israel's nuclear policies,
was briefly realized in February 1999, when a debate of the nuclear issue
occurred on the floor of the Israeli Knesset. The event was short-lived.
After shouting and recriminations, several Arab members of the Knesset who
had sparked the debate were expelled from the chamber. The stormy
circumstances showed the extent of denial that remains to be overcome. But
it was a victory, nonetheless, for those who favor nuclear abolition.
Over the years the case of Mordechai Vanunu has come to symbolize the
intractable problem of state secrecy that continues to stymie all efforts
toward world nuclear disarmament. This is why Vanunu has been nominated for
the Nobel Peace Prize every year since 1987. Though his name is a household
word in Europe, Australia, and throughout much of the rest of the world,
here in America Vanunu remains almost unknown. The US press ignores his case
because it is an embarrassment to Israel and to the US government.
Yet, spotlighting Vanunu for his courage and his witness would have salutary
effects. It would increase public awareness of the folly of President Bush's
current Mideast policies. The problem is Bush's double standard: one
standard for the US and Israel, another for everyone else. This explains why
almost nobody (outside the US) trusts the president when he says he wants to
roll back weapons of mass destruction from the Mideast. They correctly
understand that Bush is not serious. If he were he would also be pressuring
Israel to open its nuclear sites to IAEA inspectors. Israel remains the only
state in the region with nuclear weapons.
Mark Gaffney is an anti-nuclear activist and the author of a pioneering 1989
book about Israel's nuclear weapons program: DIMONA, THE THIRD TEMPLE. THE
STORY BEHIND THE VANUNU REVELATION. Mark can be reached for comment at
mhgaffney@aol.com.
|